-
1.
Nutrition after severe burn injury.
Rousseau, AF, Pantet, O, Heyland, DK
Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care. 2023;(2):99-104
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Severe burn injury causes significant metabolic changes and demands that make nutritional support particularly important. Feeding the severe burn patient is a real challenge in regard to the specific needs and the clinical constraints. This review aims to challenge the existing recommendations in the light of the few recently published data on nutritional support in burn patients. RECENT FINDINGS Some key macro- and micro-nutrients have been recently studied in severe burn patients. Repletion, complementation or supplementation of omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin C, vitamin D, antioxidant micronutrients may be promising from a physiologic perspective, but evidence of benefits on hard outcomes is still weak due to the studies' design. On the contrary, the anticipated positive effects of glutamine on the time to discharge, mortality and bacteremias have been disproved in the largest randomized controlled trial investigating glutamine supplementation in burns. An individualized approach in term of nutrients quantity and quality may proof highly valuable and needs to be validated in adequate trials. The combination of nutrition and physical exercises is another studied strategy that could improve muscle outcomes. SUMMARY Due to the low number of clinical trials focused on severe burn injury, most often including limited number of patients, developing new evidence-based guidelines is challenging. More high-quality trials are needed to improve the existing recommendations in the very next future.
-
2.
Mid-Term Evolution of the Serum Acylcarnitine Profile in Critically Ill Survivors: A Metabolic Insight into Survivorship.
Rousseau, AF, Ngongan, A, Colson, C, Minguet, P, Neis-Gilson, S, Cavalier, E, Minguet, G, Misset, B, Boemer, F
Nutrients. 2023;(16)
Abstract
It is unknown if the abnormal acylcarnitine (AC) profile observed early after discharge of a prolonged stay in an intensive care unit (ICU) would persist over time. This prospective observational study aimed to describe the mid-term AC profile evolution in survivors of a prolonged ICU stay (≥7 days). Adults enrolled in our post-ICU follow-up program and who attended the consultation 3 months (M3) after discharge were included. Serum AC concentrations were assessed within 7 days following ICU discharge (T0) and at M3. A total of 64 survivors were analyzed after an ICU stay of 15 (9-24) days. Free carnitine (C0) concentration decreased from 45.89 (35.80-127.5) to 28.73 (20.31-38.93) µmol/L (p < 0.001). C0 deficiency was not observed at T0 but in 7/64 (11%) survivors at M3. The total AC/C0 ratio (normal ≤ 0.4) was 0.33 (0.24-0.39) at T0 and reached 0.39 (0.30-0.56) at M3 (p = 0.001). A ratio >0.4 was observed in 16/64 (25%) at T0 and in 32/64 (50%) at M3 (p = 0.006). The short-chain ACs decreased from 1.310 (0.927-1.829) at T0 to 0.945 (0.709-1.127) µmol/L at M3 (p < 0.001). In parallel, the urea/creatinine ratio and the Sarcopenic Index, respectively, decreased and increased between T0 and M3. This AC profile is suspected to signal a mitochondrial dysfunction and was, especially for short-chain ACs, a marker of protein catabolism.
-
3.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinimetric properties of the core outcome measurement instruments for clinical effectiveness trials of nutritional and metabolic interventions in critical illness (CONCISE).
Davies, TW, Kelly, E, van Gassel, RJJ, van de Poll, MCG, Gunst, J, Casaer, MP, Christopher, KB, Preiser, JC, Hill, A, Gundogan, K, et al
Critical care (London, England). 2023;(1):450
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONCISE is an internationally agreed minimum set of outcomes for use in nutritional and metabolic clinical research in critically ill adults. Clinicians and researchers need to be aware of the clinimetric properties of these instruments and understand any limitations to ensure valid and reliable research. This systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to evaluate the clinimetric properties of the measurement instruments identified in CONCISE. METHODS Four electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2022 (MEDLINE via Ovid, EMBASE via Ovid, CINAHL via Healthcare Databases Advanced Search, CENTRAL via Cochrane). Studies were included if they examined at least one clinimetric property of a CONCISE measurement instrument or recognised variation in adults ≥ 18 years with critical illness or recovering from critical illness in any language. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures was used. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were used in line with COSMIN guidance. The COSMIN checklist was used to evaluate the risk of bias and the quality of clinimetric properties. Overall certainty of the evidence was rated using a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Narrative synthesis was performed and where possible, meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS A total of 4316 studies were screened. Forty-seven were included in the review, reporting data for 12308 participants. The Short Form-36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score and Physical Functioning), sit-to-stand test, 6-m walk test and Barthel Index had the strongest clinimetric properties and certainty of evidence. The Short Physical Performance Battery, Katz Index and handgrip strength had less favourable results. There was limited data for Lawson Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria. The risk of bias ranged from inadequate to very good. The certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to high. CONCLUSIONS Variable evidence exists to support the clinimetric properties of the CONCISE measurement instruments. We suggest using this review alongside CONCISE to guide outcome selection for future trials of nutrition and metabolic interventions in critical illness. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42023438187). Registered 21/06/2023.
-
4.
Serum Acylcarnitines Profile in Critically Ill Survivors According to Illness Severity and ICU Length of Stay: An Observational Study.
Rousseau, AF, Dongier, A, Colson, C, Minguet, P, Defraigne, JO, Minguet, G, Misset, B, Boemer, F
Nutrients. 2023;(10)
Abstract
The acylcarnitine (AC) profile has been shown to be altered in survivors of a prolonged stay in intensive care unit (ICU), with higher short-chain derivates compared to reference ranges. The present study aimed at describing the AC profile of patients surviving a short ICU stay versus patients surviving a >7-day multiple organ dysfunction. Patients discharged from ICU after an elective and non-complicated cardiac surgery (CS) were recruited. For each CS, one to two adults, matched for gender and age, were recruited among patients enrolled in our post-ICU follow-up program after an ICU stay ≥7 days (PS). In both groups, the AC profile was determined during the week following ICU discharge. A total of 50 CS patients (SAPS II 23 (18-27)) survived an ICU stay of 2 (2-3) days and were matched to 85 PS patients (SAPS II 36 (28-51), p < 0.001) who survived an ICU stay of 11 (8-15.5) days. No carnitine deficiency was observed in either group. Their total AC/C0 ratio was similar: 0.355 (0.268-0.415) and 0.358 (0.289-0.417), respectively (p = 0.391). A ratio >0.4 representing a disturbed mitochondrial metabolism was observed in 26/85 (30.6%) PS patients and in 15/50 (30%) CS patients (p > 0.999). The long-chain ACs were elevated in both groups, with a greater increase in the CS group. The short-chain ACs were higher in the PS group: 1.520 (1.178-1.974) vs. 1.185 (0.932-1.895) μmol/L (p < 0.001). The role of the AC profile as potential marker of catabolism and/or mitochondrial dysfunction during the critical illness trajectory should be further investigated.
-
5.
Adequacy of Nutritional Intakes during the Year after Critical Illness: An Observational Study in a Post-ICU Follow-Up Clinic.
Rousseau, AF, Lucania, S, Fadeur, M, Verbrugge, AM, Cavalier, E, Colson, C, Misset, B
Nutrients. 2022;(18)
Abstract
Whether nutritional intakes in critically ill survivors after hospital discharge are adequate is unknown. The aims of this observational study were to describe the energy and protein intakes in ICU survivors attending a follow-up clinic compared to empirical targets and to explore differences in outcomes according to intake adequacy. All adult survivors who attended the follow-up clinic at 1, 3 and 12 months (M1, M3, M12) after a stay in our intensive care unit (ICU) ≥ 7 days were recruited. Average energy and protein intakes over the 7 days before the face-to-face consultation were quantified by a dietician using food anamnesis. Self-reported intakes were compared empirically to targets for healthy people (FAO/WHO/UNU equations), for critically ill patients (25 kcal/kg/day and 1.3 g protein/kg/day). They were also compared to targets that are supposed to fit post-ICU patients (35 kcal/kg/day and 1.5 g protein/kg/day). Blood prealbumin level and handgrip strength were also measured at each timepoint. A total of 206 patients were analyzed (49, 97 and 60 at the M1, M3 and M12, respectively). At M1, M3 and M12, energy intakes were 73.2 [63.3-86.3]%, 79.3 [69.3-89.3]% and 82.7 [70.6-93.7]% of healthy targets (p = 0.074), respectively. Protein intakes were below 0.8 g/kg/day in 18/49 (36.7%), 25/97 (25.8%) and 8/60 (13.3%) of the patients at M1, M3 and M12, respectively (p = 0.018), and the protein intakes were 67.9 [46.5-95.8]%, 68.5 [48.8-99.3]% and 71.7 [44.9-95.1]% of the post-ICU targets (p = 0.138), respectively. Prealbumin concentrations and handgrip strength were similar in patients with either inadequate energy intakes or inadequate protein intakes, respectively. In our post-ICU cohort, up to one year after discharge, energy and protein intakes were below the targets that are supposed to fit ICU survivors in recovery phase.
-
6.
Positive Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
De Niet, S, Trémège, M, Coffiner, M, Rousseau, AF, Calmes, D, Frix, AN, Gester, F, Delvaux, M, Dive, AF, Guglielmi, E, et al
Nutrients. 2022;14(15)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Literature shows that having enough vitamin D can help prevent many diseases, such as heart disease, bone disease and cancer. Recent data also showed that vitamin D can reduce the risk of respiratory tract infections, and particularly, the risk of viral infections. The aim of this study was to assess whether the proposed dosing regimen of a daily dose of 25,000 international units (IU) vitamin D administered over 4 consecutive days, followed by a weekly dose of 25,000 IU, was adequate to rapidly increase the concentrations of calcifediol in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and to explore its impact on hospital length and other clinical outcomes of the disease. This study is an interventional, randomized, parallel, two-treatment, two-arm, double-blind and placebo-controlled pilot study, carried out in one clinical site in Belgium. The patients (n=50) were randomized in the two different treatment groups (vitamin D (n=26) or placebo (n=24)). Patients participated in the study for a maximum of 9 weeks, including an up to 6-week treatment period and a maximum of 3-week follow-up period. Results show that the study’s regimen was adequate to rapidly raise the calcifediol level above 20 ng/mL and improve the clinical outcome of patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19. In fact, administration of cholecalciferol significantly reduced the hospital length of stay, reduced the duration of supplemental oxygen and improved the clinical status assessed by the World Health Organisation scale. Authors conclude that further studies with a larger number of patients are needed in order to further confirm their study’s findings.
Abstract
Retrospective studies showed a relationship between vitamin D status and COVID-19 severity and mortality, with an inverse relation between SARS-CoV-2 positivity and circulating calcifediol levels. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the length of hospital stay and clinical improvement in patients with vitamin D deficiency hospitalized with COVID-19. The study was randomized, double blind and placebo controlled. A total of 50 subjects were enrolled and received, in addition to the best available COVID therapy, either vitamin D (25,000 IU per day over 4 consecutive days, followed by 25,000 IU per week up to 6 weeks) or placebo. The length of hospital stay decreased significantly in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group (4 days vs. 8 days; p = 0.003). At Day 7, a significantly lower percentage of patients were still hospitalized in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group (19% vs. 54%; p = 0.0161), and none of the patients treated with vitamin D were hospitalized after 21 days compared to 14% of the patients treated with placebo. Vitamin D significantly reduced the duration of supplemental oxygen among the patients who needed it (4 days vs. 7 days in the placebo group; p = 0.012) and significantly improved the clinical recovery of the patients, as assessed by the WHO scale (p = 0.0048). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the clinical outcome of COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization was improved by administration of vitamin D.
-
7.
Measured Energy Expenditure Using Indirect Calorimetry in Post-Intensive Care Unit Hospitalized Survivors: A Comparison with Predictive Equations.
Rousseau, AF, Fadeur, M, Colson, C, Misset, B
Nutrients. 2022;(19)
Abstract
Actual energy needs after a stay in intensive care units (ICUs) are unknown. The aims of this observational study were to measure the energy expenditure (mEE) of ICU survivors during their post-ICU hospitalization period, and to compare this to the estimations of predictive equations (eEE). Survivors of an ICU stay ≥ 7 days were enrolled in the general ward during the first 7 days after ICU discharge. EE was measured using the Q-NRG calorimeter in canopy mode. This measure was compared to the estimated EE using the Harris−Benedict (HB) equation multiplied by a 1.3 stress factor, the Penn−State (PS) equation or the 30 kcal weight-based (WB) equation. A total of 55 adults were included (67.3% male, age 60 (52−67) y, body mass index 26.1 (22.2−29.7) kg/m2). Indirect calorimetry was performed 4 (3−6) d after an ICU stay of 12 (7−16) d. The mEE was 1682 (1328−1975) kcal/d, corresponding to 22.9 (19.1−24.2) kcal/kg/day. The eEE values derived using HB and WB equations were significantly higher than mEE: 3048 (1805−3332) and 2220 (1890−2640) kcal/d, respectively (both p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between mEE and eEE using the PS equation: 1589 (1443−1809) kcal/d (p = 0.145). The PS equation tended to underestimate mEE with a bias of −61.88 kcal and a wide 95% limit of agreement (−717.8 to 594 kcal). Using the PS equation, agreement within 15% of the mEE was found in 32/55 (58.2%) of the patients. In the present cohort of patients who survived a prolonged ICU stay, mEE was around 22−23 kcal/kg/day. In this post-ICU hospitalization context, none of the tested equations were accurate in predicting the EE measured by indirect calorimetry.
-
8.
Core outcome measures for clinical effectiveness trials of nutritional and metabolic interventions in critical illness: an international modified Delphi consensus study evaluation (CONCISE).
Davies, TW, van Gassel, RJJ, van de Poll, M, Gunst, J, Casaer, MP, Christopher, KB, Preiser, JC, Hill, A, Gundogan, K, Reintam-Blaser, A, et al
Critical care (London, England). 2022;(1):240
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical research on nutritional and metabolic interventions in critically ill patients is heterogenous regarding time points, outcomes and measurement instruments used, impeding intervention development and data syntheses, and ultimately worsening clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify and develop a set of core outcome domains and associated measurement instruments to include in all research in critically ill patients. METHODS An updated systematic review informed a two-stage modified Delphi consensus process (domains followed by instruments). Measurement instruments for domains considered 'essential' were taken through the second stage of the Delphi and a subsequent consensus meeting. RESULTS In total, 213 participants (41 patients/caregivers, 50 clinical researchers and 122 healthcare professionals) from 24 countries contributed. Consensus was reached on time points (30 and 90 days post-randomisation). Three domains were considered 'essential' at 30 days (survival, physical function and Infection) and five at 90 days (survival, physical function, activities of daily living, nutritional status and muscle/nerve function). Core 'essential' measurement instruments reached consensus for survival and activities of daily living, and 'recommended' measurement instruments for physical function, nutritional status and muscle/nerve function. No consensus was reached for a measurement instrument for Infection. Four further domains met criteria for 'recommended,' but not 'essential,' to measure at 30 days post-randomisation (organ dysfunction, muscle/nerve function, nutritional status and wound healing) and three at 90 days (frailty, body composition and organ dysfunction). CONCLUSION The CONCISE core outcome set is an internationally agreed minimum set of outcomes for use at 30 and 90 days post-randomisation, in nutritional and metabolic clinical research in critically ill adults.
-
9.
Post-intensive care screening: French translation and validation of the Healthy Aging Brain Care-Monitor, hybrid version.
Horlait, G, Beaudart, C, Bougard, L, Bornheim, S, Colson, C, Misset, B, Bruyère, O, Boustani, M, Rousseau, AF
Health and quality of life outcomes. 2022;(1):59
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Healthy Aging Brain Care-Monitor (HABC-M) questionnaires (self-reported version and caregiver version) have been validated for post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) detection in patients surviving a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Their authors have also developed a hybrid version (HABC-M-HV) suited to the daily needs of their post-ICU follow-up clinic. The objectives of the present cross-sectional observational study were to translate the HABC-M-HV questionnaire into French (HABC-M-HV-F) according to international guidelines and to test its measurement properties. METHODS The HABC-M-HV was translated according to international guidelines. The measurement performances of the questionnaire were tested using internal consistency, test-retest reliability, Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) calculation, floor and ceiling effect measurement and construct validity. RESULTS The validation study included 51 ICU survivors (27.5% women, 63 [55-71] years old). The questionnaire was administered by phone. The internal consistency was very good (Cronbach's alpha coefficient 0.79). The intra- and inter-examinator reliabilities were excellent (Intraclass Coefficient Correlation = 0.99 and 0.97, respectively). The SEM was 0.62 and the SDC was 1.72. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. The convergent validity was almost entirely confirmed with 71.4% of our hypothesis confirmed. CONCLUSION The HABC-M-HV-F has been shown to be a valid and reliable tool for PICS screening and follow-up in French-speaking ICU survivors. A remote administration by phone was feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.
-
10.
Oral Nutrition during and after Critical Illness: SPICES for Quality of Care!
Fadeur, M, Preiser, JC, Verbrugge, AM, Misset, B, Rousseau, AF
Nutrients. 2020;(11)
Abstract
Malnutrition is associated to poor outcomes in critically ill patients. Oral nutrition is the route of feeding in less than half of the patients during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay and in the majority of ICU survivors. There are growing data indicating that insufficient and/or inadequate intakes in macronutrients and micronutrients are prevalent within these populations. The present narrative review focuses on barriers to food intakes and considers the different points that should be addressed in order to optimize oral intakes, both during and after ICU stay. They are gathered in the SPICES concept, which should help ICU teams improve the quality of nutrition care following 5 themes: swallowing disorders screening and management, patient global status overview, involvement of dieticians and nutritionists, clinical evaluation of nutritional intakes and outcomes, and finally, supplementation in macro-or micronutrients.